data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/87da5/87da5b34e42a75338a2a4cd9e9c0326544de069c" alt="NMN021318-cover-bubble.jpg"
Home prices are at an all-time high in more than half of 112 metropolitan areas with a population of 200,000, according to Attom Data Solutions U.S. Home Sales Report. On top of that, most U.S. wages were flat until just recently and
Combined with a gap between incomes and home prices that is historically wide in certain local markets, these pressures on affordability puts certain areas at risk for a housing bubble.
Here's a look at 10 counties in metropolitan areas where home prices have outpaced wages by the biggest margins year-over-year, and purchasing power is at historic lows.
The data, from the Attom Data Home Affordability Index, measures average wages to buy a median-priced home on a recent and historical basis. The third-quarter 2017 data is ranked by the difference between the year-over-year increase in median home prices and the increase in average weekly wages needed to buy a median-priced house during the same period.
All the counties that follow have an affordability index below 100, meaning they are less affordable now than they have been historically on average; and in each area, more than 50% of average wages are needed to buy a median-priced home.
The ranking only includes counties that had a population of at least 100,000 and at least 100 homes sales during the quarter.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/513b3/513b35e673773678364039b4ba7facd4aafb27d6" alt="NMN021318-franklin-tennessee.jpg"
No. 10: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, Tenn. (Williamson County)
Gap between growth in home prices and wages: 4.11%
Affordability Index: 94
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae428/ae4281e0a05f538123594ba13d01eefdaef25970" alt="NMN021318-st-george.jpg"
No. 9: St. George, Utah (Washington County)
Median sales price: $262,802
Gap between growth in home prices and wages: 4.69%
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4895c/4895cb6b99069fdad99154a44ca9aa8296f508b9" alt="NMN021318-brooklyn.jpg"
No. 8: New York-Newark-Jersey City, N.Y.-N.J.-Pa. (Kings County, N.Y.)
Gap between growth in home prices and wages: 4.73%
Affordability Index: 89
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8e88/b8e886d850b3ccca17e17c0cef51b8b94eaaa67a" alt="NMN021318-medford-ore.jpg"
No. 7: Medford, Ore. (Jackson County)
Gap between growth in home prices and wages: 6.09%
Affordability Index: 98
No. 6: San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward, Calif. (Contra Costa County)
Gap between growth in home prices and wages: 6.45%
Affordability Index: 94
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4bd92/4bd924fd3a655532aecb350088e93522b9511d80" alt="NMN021318-snohomish-county-courthouse.jpg"
No. 5: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, Wash. (Snohomish County)
Gap between growth in home prices and wages: 7.05%
Affordability Index: 94
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81feb/81febeee3b7e6e334a9be7b63e35c8d67deb1176" alt="NMN021318-placerville-ca.jpg"
No. 4: Sacramento-Roseville-Arden-Arcade, Calif. (El Dorado County)
Gap between growth in home prices and wages: 8.03%
Affordability Index: 98
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9809b/9809b5100a230d0ffe87c17ee4c0cfeafd50a1e6" alt="NMN021318-dayton-ore.jpg"
No. 3: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, Ore.-Wash. (Yamhill County, Ore.)
Price-Wage Growth Gap: 8.05%
Affordability Index: 84
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/872ce/872ce681690e68caa11902b60177c1f9c9fa3971" alt="NMN021318-seattle.jpg"
No. 2: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, Wash. (King County)
Price-Wage Growth Gap: 11.24%
Affordability Index: 95
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39df7/39df7d26cc0c05fa308bef6ab9053178ae152be7" alt="NMN021318-new-braunfels.jpg"
No. 1: San Antonio-New Braunfels, Texas (Comal County)
Price-Wage Growth Gap: 14.04%
Affordability Index: 77