People electing to remain in their primary residence for longer periods took more potential home sales out of the market than lower interest rates and higher income brought in, according to
Potential existing-home sales in May increased 0.4% from April to 5.2 million at a seasonally adjusted annualized rate. But compared with a year ago, the market's potential declined by 1.5%, according to First American's index.
But even with the year-to-year reduction in the number of potential sales, the market outperformed its capability by a seasonally adjusted estimated 11,400 sales in May, compared with a deficit of 68,000 in April and 289,000 for the
"Since last year, several forces have helped increase the market potential for existing-home sales," First American Chief Economist Mark Fleming said in a press release. "
Looser
"Despite all the positives, the market potential for home sales remains nearly 80,000 units below the level of a year ago," Fleming said.
"Collectively, the aforementioned market forces contributed to a positive gain of 366,000 potential home sales, but it was not enough to offset the loss of 446,000 potential sales due to the impact of rising tenure. The average tenure length, the amount of time a typical homeowner lives in their home, has increased dramatically in the last year."
Recent data Fleming cited indicated the average tenure a person lives in their home was 11.3 years in May, a 10% increase from the prior year.
Seniors electing to age in place are another factor that is pulling potential sales from the market. A recent
Those looking to become homeowners could be
Investor purchases made up 11.3% of 2018's home sales, the most since CoreLogic started tracking this data in 1999. In the low-price tier, investors made up 20.2% of the buyers. However, since 2011, between nearly 17% and 20% of purchases at the low end were made by investors.
The large increases in investor activity between 2012 and 2018 were strongly correlated with tightening housing market conditions, CoreLogic said.
"Does this mean investors snapped up supply that would have otherwise been bought by owner-occupiers? Maybe, but the evidence isn't conclusive because there's a possible chicken-or-egg relationship between the two," said CoreLogic Deputy Chief Economist Ralph McLaughlin in the report. "While it's certainly possible that an increase in investors into a market increases competition and lowers supply relative to aggregate demand, the opposite is also possible: markets with tightening supply could draw investors as they perceive markets with a dwindling supply to be safer bets than those with a more plentiful supply."