A Chicago-area loan originator was found guilty of five
A federal jury convicted Kevin Smith in September for running a scam that deceived lending companies into improperly originating
A grand jury filed charges in late 2019, and the case was prosecuted by federal lawyers representing the Justice Department, as well as the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Department of Veterans Affairs.
"Smith abused his position of trust as a gatekeeper of FHA-insured mortgage loans and used his real estate knowledge to circumvent the rules to secure his own self-interest," said Machelle L. Jindra, special agent-in-charge of HUD's Office of Inspector General in Chicago.
During the scheme, which lasted from mid 2011 to 2013, Smith targeted
In reality, Smith helped provide the down payments to originate the FHA purchase mortgages. After loans closed, Smith would make what he described as "grants" of as much as $20,000 to the buyers, while keeping seller payments for himself without notifying HUD or lenders involved.
During the period in which the crimes occurred, Smith was a loan originator working with Grand Bank and Mortgage Services III, both among the defrauded, according to the grand jury indictment. He also sought to involve other mortgage companies in the scheme to help finance investor purchases, including 360 Mortgage Group, which was identified in one of the counts as a victim.
Policies governing single-family mortgages FHA guarantees mandates borrowers use them to fund a primary residence. Instances of fraud typically require the
"Loan originators and other mortgage professionals are entrusted with protecting the integrity of the government-backed mortgage program," added Acting U.S. Attorney Morris Pasqual. "Our office will continue to hold accountable any individual who violates that trust to line their own pockets."
Smith faces up to 30 years in prison for each guilty count. Sentencing is scheduled for Dec. 17.
He previously moved, but failed, to get charges dismissed for various reasons, citing the court's lack of jurisdiction, noncompliance with criminal procedures and violations of the Privacy Act. He also called his indictment "multiplicitous" for charging a single offense as separate counts, thereby violating the Fifth Amendment's Double Jeopardy clause.
Earlier this year,