Freddie Mac's former CEO Don Layton predicts that higher GSE lending costs lie ahead, should the Trump administration’s plans for the agencies move forward.
That's in part because guarantee fees eventually became the main source of revenue for government-sponsored enterprises after they entered conservatorship in 2008 and underwent reforms aimed at reducing taxpayer risk.
And now reproposed capital requirements for Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae suggest the GSEs will need more revenue if they exit conservatorship.
Donald "Don" Layton, chief executive officer of Freddie Mac, speaks at the annual Milken Institute Global Conference in Beverly Hills, California, U.S., on Monday, April 28, 2014. The conference brings together hundreds of chief executive officers, senior government officials and leading figures in the global capital markets for discussions on social, political and economic challenges. Photographer: Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg *** Local Caption *** Don Layton
Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg
"This will have a major impact on the cost of mortgage credit," said Layton, who is currently a senior industry fellow at the Harvard Joint Center for Housing Studies. "Guarantee fees, or revenue of the GSEs, will need to go up to be able to have a proper return on the shareholders' equity."
Mortgage industry groups recently asked Fannie and Freddie's conservator and regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency, to extend the time they have to comment on the latest GSE capital proposal, citing concerns about its potential impact on the cost and availability of mortgage financing. If fees increase, lenders would likely pass on the extra cost to consumers. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac buy and guarantee securitized loans that represent a significant portion of mortgages originated in the United States, so their policies have an enormous impact.
Overall, Layton gave the FHFA's proposal a mixed review during a recent Harvard webinar.
He said if the FHFA's intention is to concentrate credit risk back into the GSEs the way it was prior to 2008, it "kind of works." He conceded that the proposal's higher capital requirements for Fannie and Freddie also make sense.
But Layton was critical of the costs involved in raising the capital relative to the benefits received from exiting conservatorship.
"I think there's materially increased systemic risk offset by capitalization in a very expensive way," he said.
The fiscal condition at the government agency is much healthier today than when the Department of Housing and Urban Development put the policy into effect back in 2013.
Activity from smaller mom-and-pop investors dominates the segment, but their impact on overall housing prices might be overstated, Corelogic's research found.
Flood insurance could hold up some home sales and lending, while major bank regulatory agencies will remain funded even if the government is unable to pass the necessary legislation before funding runs out.
The Federal Housing Administration is suggesting servicers get early access to the funds they have advanced at a time when many T&I payments have been high.
A borrower alleges the bank made billions of dollars in profit off millions of dollars in rate lock extension fees it wrongly charged mortgage customers.
