The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation is suing over a dozen mortgage firms in federal courts to recoup funds over loans they brokered over 14 years ago for Washington Mutual.
The agency in its complaints points to a combined 373 home loans it claims were defective for a variety of reasons, according to a National Mortgage News review of federal court records. While dollar amounts sought aren't disclosed, some alleged bad underwriting for the loans in question includes five-figure kickbacks and six-figure borrower debts.
The FDIC's pursuit stems from the fallout of its takeover of WaMu in 2008 during the Great Financial Crisis. Deutsche Bank, a trustee for mortgage-backed securities including the defective WaMu loans, sued the agency in 2009 for indemnification for its securities.
The sides reached a
"I'm really quite concerned about them taking this stance when they stand in the shoes of those banks who were really at fault, lenders at fault, not the brokers who are just giving them information they asked for," said Mukesh Advani, a Bay Area attorney representing defendant Cal Coast Financial.
The FDIC sued East Bay-based Cal Coast in August over 21 mortgages the company brokered for WaMu and its subsidiary, Long Beach Mortgage Co.
The FDIC declined to comment last week, while its counsel and other companies either declined to comment or didn't respond to questions. Two lenders facing such lawsuits, Guild Mortgage and Supreme Lending, have responded to the FDIC's complaints in brewing court battles.
The 14 firms named in lawsuits in the past 12 months range from small operations to major players, such as Freedom Mortgage. Mortgage companies are being sued for indemnification for as few as 14 loans, in Guild's case, to as many as 72 loans from Benchmark Mortgage. The Plano, Texas-based Benchmark is scheduled to take the FDIC to trial next June, court records show.
Other businesses the FDIC is suing include American Nationwide Mortgage Co.; Lennar Mortgage; The Mortgage Link; Mortgage Management Consultants; New Jersey Lenders; PNC Bank as successor to smaller firms; Primary Residential Mortgage Inc.; Pulte Mortgage and RealFi Home Funding Corp.
The lawsuits are nearly uniform in length and language, describing the FDIC-WaMu receivership's losses as arising from inaccurate and/or incomplete loan applications and documentation produced by the brokers.
Each company signed broker agreements with WaMu and its subsidiaries, such as Long Beach Mortgage, in 2004 and 2005, according to exhibits attached to each claim. The FDIC in each case includes an exhibit describing in brief the defects of each loan, the majority appearing to be misrepresented credit or income and debt.
In the FDIC's lawsuit against Lennar, it alleges one borrower suggested a $60,000 monthly income, six times their actual earnings, while another homebuyer failed to disclose over $660,000 in mortgage debt from a previous property. Lennar last week declined to comment on pending litigation.
Each lawsuit also cites a six-year limitation to file claims following the 2017 Deutsche Bank agreement, and attorneys for lenders said they anticipate more FDIC complaints against lenders.
James Brody, an attorney with Irvine-based Garris Horn LLP, represents Guild and was recently retained by The Mortgage Link in its own FDIC litigation. In regards to the Guild lawsuit, Brody shared a statement this week calling the FDIC's case "extremely weak" and noted the complaint's lack of specifics around losses attributable to Guild's brokered loans.
"We certainly anticipate that there will be a number of motions for summary judgment that will be filed with the Court by most if not all parties that don't decide to settle out because of their own cost/benefit considerations," he wrote.
Guild anticipates filing a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the lawsuit, Brody said.
