CREFC head on current state of the commercial market

pendergast-lisa-crefc
Lisa Pendergast is the executive director of the Commercial Real Estate Finance Council
Dupont Photographers

The outlook for the income-producing mortgage market is mixed, the Commercial Real Estate Finance Council found when it held its annual conference in Miami, which drew over 3,000 people, earlier this month.

But the group's executive director, Lisa Pendergast, thinks there was relatively more optimism this year.

Her view is in line with the take on the conference from commercial mortgage-backed securities analysts like Sarah Barcomb who said the sense of the conference was "overall issuance should increase" but there's "still lots of work to do" on problem loans, or BofA Global Research's Alan Todd and Henry Navarrete Brooks, who described the consensus market view at the conference a "not necessarily bullish, but was definitely less bearish."

"While most investors we spoke with felt significantly better about current market conditions than they did several months ago, most acknowledged problems remain that lower interest rates won't be able to cure," Todd and Brooks said in a recent CMBS Weekly report.

To get Pendergast's view on these issues and the broader market outlook, National Mortgage News spoke with her via phone during the conference about some of the current issues in financing commercial real estate, and multifamily properties in particular.

Prior to joining the council, Pendergast was with Jefferies LLC. She started in July 2009 and was managing director and head of CMBS strategy and risk, working within the fixed income division broader group that also included asset-backed and residential securitizations. In 2010 and 2011, she served as president of CREFC.

Pendergast also was a managing director in the fixed income strategies group at Royal Bank of Scotland and before that, a research analyst in the residential MBS marketplace at Prudential Securities.

The questions and answers have been edited for length and clarity.

It is no secret the banks are having issues right now with commercial real estate. Is that having an impact or will have an impact on financing availability in 2024?

I think it will, but not a significant one. And I'll tell you why. There had been some SEC regulations proposed for the securitization markets that ended up not happening. But what has in fact occurred was Basel III for banks that are $100 billion and larger. The capital charges under the Basel plan are going to be significant, to as much as 20% of the loan. I think the banks are going to be a little bit cautious about how much commercial real estate they put on their books. So how would the banks operate in the current environment and that's really to securitize. The chances are that they will originate loans like conduits again, I think that they'll go the securitization route in order to avoid those capital charges. That whole gestation period where you're putting a pool together and you're originating loans, that's going to be a little bit of a capital charge for them, but it's not going to last for long. So you can see some of the CMBS transactions come back into vogue. Over the last several years, you've seen a lot of the single borrower CMBS market, one loan or one portfolio to one borrower, being financed via a single asset, single borrower CMBS. And all of the securitization markets are likely to see a pickup in volume given the capital charges of originating loans.

Are you including Fannie and Freddie in that securitization angle or are you treating them as a collective financing outlet separate from CMBS?

I break it down into agency CMBS and non-agency CMBS, which is conduit and single asset, single borrower CMBS. They have a great program for multifamily lending, both Fannie and Freddie. Ginnie Mae is the only one that will originate a construction loan amongst the three of those bodies. What's going to happen is that you'll see the agencies step up and do multifamily. Everything has slowed down at this juncture, just because of the uncertainty. Most of those loans are transitional, they may be 70% occupied with the goal of getting it to 95% over the next six months, 12 months or whatever it might be. But I am always impressed with how much multifamily they do. And I think in some ways, it's a good thing to have them out there because they are creating and developing those transitional loans creating ultimately more multifamily units, which I think we need.

Fitch recently put out a commentary talking about loans coming due this year and the possibilities of higher defaults as they are unable to refinance. What is the mood of the conference, are they seeing an inability to find new funding as a serious issue?

Obviously, they [the Federal Reserve] are not going to move 100 basis points [lower] their first time out. This is probably a 25 to 50 basis point move once they get there and they're not there yet. The real question is there's a significant amount of loans that need to be refinanced and the basic challenge is that these loans were originated at a time where, during COVID, where the Fed eased and put a bunch of liquidity into the market, and the rates were much lower than they are today, given where benchmark rates are right now. The Fed keeps tightening and it's just causing the cost of financings on real estate to increase. There are some situations where you will see an uptick in maturity defaults, where it's challenging to refinance that loan, particularly if the value of the asset has deteriorated. So now you have two problems. You have difficulties refinancing the balance that existed, because the value of the assets may not be what it was. And then the other side of it is, you're now going to have a loan that's significantly higher in terms of the mortgage interest rate. It depends on the willingness of the borrower to put more capital into the deal and to make up that differential. The good news is that multifamily as an asset class is doing reasonably well. If you look at multifamily delinquencies, in November 2023, and that's my most recent data, but they were about 2.5% on the CMBS side, and that's conduit, not agency. Whereas, some of the other sectors like retail are almost 6.6%. So you know, and the only other [property type] that's much better than multifamily is industrial where you have 40 basis points, 0.38%, in terms of delinquency, so the numbers aren't crazy. If you look at the November numbers, the weighted average is about a 4.6% delinquency rate. The loans that were underwritten since 2021 are far more conservative in terms of their loan-to-value ratios, debt service coverage ratios, and all of those metrics. It makes sense, because at the end of the day, these lenders aren't in the business of making loans that are going to default 12 months later. And the market is in reasonably good shape. But, you will see higher levels of delinquencies and losses, particularly if you've seen deterioration in the value of the real estate, as well as an increase in mortgage rates. It's kind of a double whammy for the borrower. 

What about the financing of conversions from office to housing; any discussions of that during the conference?

I didn't listen in on every session. But what I do know about it, whether I hear it from here or elsewhere, is when the whole office downturn hit, the thought was, here's the solution, we're going to just convert all of these office properties to multifamily because we're short housing. And the reality is that that really only works for a certain type of office property. It's not going to work for these big money-center offices with a giant amount of internal space. The reality is that's wasted space. And so somebody who's going to pick up an office property like that, that may have gone sideways, they're going to need a very significant discount, and even then, they're just not able to build that internal space out as apartment units. So you find that all you can do is build out the periphery of the office space for multifamily, and so some of this doesn't necessarily pencil out. What does pencil out for office though, are those smaller office buildings. It remains to be seen how that all develops. It's a great idea, but you know, sometimes great ideas, they're not feasible, or are really difficult to do at scale. A conversion is a wonderful idea but it doesn't work everywhere.
MORE FROM NATIONAL MORTGAGE NEWS